Legal Opinion
Westray v. Porthole, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 22, 1984No. Civ. A. R-84-433, R-84-434PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAMSEY, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are the defendants’ motions to dismiss in the above-captioned cases. The plaintiffs have filed memoranda in opposition. The motions will be considered together because the com plaints in each case are substantially similar, and the motions and memoranda are identical. The Court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 6(E) without the need for oral argument.
These actions were brought under 42 U.S.C. § 2000a et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Thirteenth Amendment, and Article 49B, § 5 of the Maryland Annotated Code “seeking to redress…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Dow v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Bray v. RHT, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- John Roe I v. Bridgestone Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.