People v. Rosaia
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAMLIN, J.
Defendant was charged with assault with intent to commit rape (Pen. Code, § 220) 1 and assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)). He pleaded guilty to assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury on condition that he be sentenced to no more than two years in state prison. The court dismissed the charge of assault with intent to commit rape.
Defendant was denied probation and sentenced to two years in state prison. He appeals but does not challenge the validity of his guilty plea.
The primary issue presented herein is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. ManchenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.