Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1992No. F014761PublishedCited by 24 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, P. J.

Perry Eugene King appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of discharging a firearm at an occupied building (Pen. Code, 1 § 246). In the published portion of the opinion we reject his contention that he is entitled to two additional days of conduct credit under section 4019 and the principle of equal protection of the laws.

Statement of Facts *

Discussion

/. Custody Credits

Defendant received 47 days of actual custody credit and 22 days of good-time/work-time credit for a total of 69 days. He contends he is entitled to two additional days of conduct…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. RosaiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. TerrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. The People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API