Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1980No. Civ. 19491Published

1Opinion of the Court

113 Cal.App.3d 715 (1980)

170 Cal. Rptr. 75

CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; RONILE LAMBERT, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. 19491.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

November 26, 1980.

COUNSEL

James P. Jackson, City Attorney, and Stephen B. Nocita, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Melvyn J. Coben for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

EVANS, J.

In Leslie v. Roe (1974) 41 Cal. App.3d 104 [116 Cal. Rptr. 386] (hg. den.), the court held that indigency does not entitle a party in a civil action to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Allen v. Humboldt County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Leslie v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Darley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Civil Service Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API