Bielenberg v. Higgins
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants after demurrers to plaintiff’s amended complaint were sustained.
The material allegations of the amended complaint are as follows: That Nicholas J. Bielenberg and W. I. Higgins each owned an undivided one-half interest in a group of mining claims in Madison county, and during and prior to the year 1917 they were engaged in working the claims under the partnership name of Bielenberg & Higgins; that no mining operations have been conducted by the partnership since 1917, but the partners have been engaged in efforts to sell the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Adams v. StenehjemMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Grogan v. Valley Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Marcellus v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1916
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ashley v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Pincus v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Stagg v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Wertzberger v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.