People v. Pou
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously af*643firmed. Memorandum: The court properly received into evidence against defendant the statement made by his alleged coconspirator, O’Keefe. At trial, defendant objected to the receipt of that statement on the ground that there was no showing that a conspiracy existed between defendant and O’Keefe, citing the case of People v Liccione (50 NY2d 850, rearg denied 51 NY2d 770). On appeal, defendant does not argue that the People failed to prove a conspiracy. He argues, instead, that the admission of the statement of the coconspirator violated the Confrontation Clause of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. LiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. MackellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MackellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. NisbettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Pou v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- People v. BrunnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Pou v. KeaneDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.