Legal Opinion
Pou v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1996No. 91 Civ. 6208 (JES)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Salvador Pou, 1 acting pro se, brings the instant action against defendants United States Drug Enforcement Agency (the “DEA”), Joseph Loszynzki, Robert Fritzen and James L. Rogers seeking to recover $18,200 in cash seized by the DEA and forfeited to the United States Government (the “Government”). Pou claims that defendants conducted an illegal search and seizure and gave him inadequate notice of the forfeiture proceeding in violation of his federal statutory and constitutional rights. Pursuant to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bieregu v. AshcroftDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Adams v. SpringmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Concepcion v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. DerenakDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
- United States v. RandallDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.