Legal Opinion

People v. Mackell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1976PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.

The defendants were convicted, at an Extraordinary Special and Trial Term of the Supreme Court, of conspiracy in the fourth degree, hindering prosecution in the third degree and official misconduct. On appeal, the Appellate Division, finding that the evidence was legally insufficient, unanimously reversed, expressly stating it did so on the law and the facts, and dismissed the indictment (47 AD2d 209).

We have previously delineated the issue now before us in the course of deciding a motion made by the defendants to dismiss this appeal on the ground that our court lacks jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. MackellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. People v. BellowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. Dawn Maria C.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. CastilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. GilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. SchwimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API