Legal Opinion

Manning v. Pomerene

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1917No. 20008PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

Action under the workmen’s compensation act. The plaintiff was a steam-fitter’s helper employed by the defendant, who was engaged in the heating and plumbing business. While engaged in attending to a boiler for the defendant, the plaintiff attempted to move two steel “I” beams resting about three feet from the'floor by pushing against the beams with his body. He did this once or twice, when he felt faint and sick, and Avas compelled to sit doAvn. He was unable to work during the remainder of the day. He worked the next day at overseeing some other men. The next day was Sunday. He felt sick…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Duprey's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Forrest v. Roper Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Patrick v. J. B. Ham Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Brown's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  3. Anderson v. CowgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bekelski v. O. F. Neal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Schulz v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API