Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Fairfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1952No. 31913PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was instituted by respondent to recover damages arising out of a collision between an automobile he was driving and one being operated by appellant. In his complaint, respondent named as codefendant the wife of appellant. Appellant alleged he was a single man. No issue was raised in the reply as to marital status, and we shall treat the action as having been brought against the appellant alone. The case was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict for respondent.

On January 7, 1950, shortly after five o’clock in the morning, respondent was driving an automobile belonging to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Auwarter v. KrollWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Cramer v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. O'DONOGHUE v. RiggsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Keegan v. Grant County Public Utility District No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Vangemert v. McCalmonWashington Supreme Court · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API