Legal Opinion
Madera v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Madera)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 2007No. 19-11212PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (the “SJ Motion”) of Defendant Ameriquest Mortgage Company (“Ameriquest”) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Permission to Amend Complaint (the “Amendment Motion”). 1 For the reason that follow, the SJ Motion is granted and the Amendment Motion is denied.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2
Plaintiffs Deborah (“Deborah”) and Michael (“Michael”) Madera (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are co-owners of property located at 401 Twin Streams Drive, Warmin-ster, Pennsylvania (the “Premises”). 3 In January 2005,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cohen v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Stuart v. Decision One Mortgage Co., LLC (In Re Stuart)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Dahl v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Goforth v. United States of America Department of Education (In Re Goforth)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cooley v. Wachovia Mortgage Co. (In Re Cooley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.