Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 1, 2008No. 1333 WDA 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
HUDOCK, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the trial court’s final judgment entered in this case. We affirm.
112 This case involves Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) 1 claims brought by Randolph D. Dahl, Sr., and Mary K. Dahl (the Dahls) against Ameri-quest Mortgage Company (Ameriquest) and National Real Estate Information Services (NREIS). The Dahls claim that Am-eriquest and NREIS faded to secure hazard insurance on the Dahls’ property upon the refinancing of a mortgage. The trial court aptly summarized the pertinent facts as fohows:
On September 13, 1999, [the Dahls and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Drelles v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- United States v. Sarun CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Belleville v. David Cutler GroupCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Trunzo v. Citi MortgageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- McAndrew v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Trunzo v. Citi MortgageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Brubacher Excavating Inc. v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg N.A., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.