Legal Opinion

State v. Zuehlke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The evidence sustains the conviction. The ruling upon the motion for a change of venue must he sustained. There was a strong showing on the part of the state that public sentiment in the county was such that a fair trial of the defendant could be had. No sufficient showing of excitement or prejudice that would interfere with defendant’s rights was made. The affidavits in opposition to the motion which were filed by the state answered the objections raised by the defendant. The correctness of the conclusion of the trial judge in that respect was demonstrated by the fact that no-difficulty was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
  4. Thornton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Wojtycski v. HanleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Tessler v. KubiakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API