Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaplan

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided February 15, 1923PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, District Judge.

The above cases embrace a number of questions in connection with search and seizure under the Prohibition Act, and, while the facts are not identical in any two cases, the same principle will control two or more, and the general principles applicable are nearly related. It seems best therefore to discuss the principles involved, and then to determine each case by the application of such principles.

Eorm of Search Warrant.

1. Applying the provisions of the Eourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and those of the Espionage Act (40 Stat. 228, tit. 11…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. In Re FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Clio King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. State v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API