State Ex Rel. Tessler v. Kubiak
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The main contention of appellant is that the search of his car was illegal. If true, the later seizure of the tools was illegal and the motion to suppress the evidence should have been granted. The appellant testified upon the motion to suppress the evidence that the car he was driving was stopped by a police squad car at an early hour on May 21, 1949. A police sergeant in uniform asked him why he was cruising around the neighborhood and he replied, “I just went around the block once. Would you consider that cruising?” After a few questions by the officer as to what he was doing and where he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. WhatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Campbell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Gray v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Myers v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Tell v. WolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Hansen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. FriedlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.