Legal Opinion

Holt v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1962PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The defendant’s contentions can be grouped into five separate categories:

1. Unlawful Search and Seizure.

The defendant urges that her constitutional rights were infringed upon when the officers gained admittance to the home at the invitation of her husband and also when they searched the premises without a search warrant.

The husband’s act of admitting the officers was consistent with his status. He had at least equal prerogatives on the premises and had authority to admit others to his home. We do not have to go as far as the court did in United States v. Sferas (7th Cir. 1954), 210 Fed. (2d)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. SlusserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. AtenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Embry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API