Legal Opinion

Neal v. A-Best Prods. Co., 22026 (12-31-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2008No. 22026Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellee Shirley Neal bought the underlying cause of action on her own behalf and as executrix of the estate of Arthur Neal, against sixty-two companies that had allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products to workplaces frequented by Neal's husband, Arthur. Neal alleged in the complaint that Arthur had significant exposure to asbestos and/or asbestos-containing products during 23 years of employment as a sheet-metal worker and laborer. Neal further alleged that Arthur had developed asbestos-related lung diseases and had died in September 2002, as a direct and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API