Legal Opinion
Graham R. v. Jane S.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 2014No. 6955 S-15158PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Graham R. and Jane S. have one child. 1 A 2006 court order granted Graham sole legal and primary physical custody. In 2012 Graham traveled to California for heart surgery and took the child with him, cutting off contact with Jane and causing her to miss a number of scheduled visits. When Graham returned to Alaska Jane moved for sole legal and primary physical custody, and the superior court granted her motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. Graham appeals the superior court's order, arguing that it was barred by principles of res judicata and collateral…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Americana Fabrics, Inc. v. L & L Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Buster v. GaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Fardig v. FardigAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Siekawitch v. SiekawitchAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Hamilton v. HamiltonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. BarileAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Regina C. v. Michael C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Hope P. v. Flynn G.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Moore v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Stephan P. v. Cecilia A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.