Fardig v. Fardig
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Kristine Owen (formerly Fardig) appeals a modification of custody rights denying her custody of her minor children. She claims that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the trial court from *11considering her drug abuse. Moreover, she argues that the superior court improperly weighed the evidence in making its decision. The superior court's decision satisfies the appropriate standard of review and is therefore affirmed.
II FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Kristine Owen and Earle Fardig separated in September 1994. They divorced August 16,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Jenkins v. HandelAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- House v. HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Barrett v. AlguireAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Siekawitch v. SiekawitchAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Rego v. RegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Kent v. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Elton H. v. Naomi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Ronny M. v. Nanette H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Rodvik v. RodvikAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.