Legal Opinion

Siekawitch v. Siekawitch

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1998No. S-8233PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises out of a dispute between Daniel and Amy Siekawitch over the custody of their two children. The parties filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in which they agreed that Daniel would have physical custody and that they would amicably arrange for visitation. Their subsequent efforts to agree upon a visitation schedule failed, and Amy moved for a “Specific Physical Custody Schedule.” Following a hearing, the superior court ordered the parties to share physical custody equally. Daniel appeals on three grounds. First, he argues that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bird v. StarkeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Nichols v. MandelinAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fardig v. FardigAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Elton H. v. Naomi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API