Siekawitch v. Siekawitch
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises out of a dispute between Daniel and Amy Siekawitch over the custody of their two children. The parties filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in which they agreed that Daniel would have physical custody and that they would amicably arrange for visitation. Their subsequent efforts to agree upon a visitation schedule failed, and Amy moved for a “Specific Physical Custody Schedule.” Following a hearing, the superior court ordered the parties to share physical custody equally. Daniel appeals on three grounds. First, he argues that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Bird v. StarkeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Nichols v. MandelinAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Fardig v. FardigAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Elton H. v. Naomi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.