Legal Opinion

National Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 21, 1927No. 6 Div. 768PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The trial was had on count A and the general issue, with leave to avail of any defense shown by the evidence that may have been specially pleaded. The plaintiff assumes in his pleading the burden of proof that his injuries were sustained while in casual and not in,the usual course of the trade.

The plaintiff, working as a painter of defendant’s houses, rented or provided for its employSs, and while so employed and engaged was injured. The manner of his injury may be stated as follows:

“Almost all of the houses then being painted were of the one-story variety, and the defendant furnished a bench…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Uphoff v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. State v. PraetoriansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Baggett Transp. Co. v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Heiliger v. City of SheldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API