Legal Opinion

In re Proceedings for Alteration of a Public Road

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1923No. 23,154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Certiorari to review the orders of the district court of the Tenth judicial district directing the opening of certain highways for public travel by the town organizations through which they passed and relieving the counties of Fillmore and Houston from the obligation to build or construct.

On May 23,1922, the district court laid out certain described highways in the counties of Fillmore and Houston. The portion of the trial court’s order important here is as follows:

“And it is further ordered, that the highways laid out as above be opened for public travel by the town organization through…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Alteration of Highway in Counties of Fillmore & HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. In re KlossnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API