Legal Opinion
Gardner v. NJ PINELANDS COM'N
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 8, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
227 N.J. Super. 396 (1988)
547 A.2d 725
HOBART R. GARDNER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Burlington County.
Decided July 8, 1988.
Patrick McAndrew, for plaintiff (Brandt, Haughey, Penberthy, Lewis & Hyland, attorneys).
Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, for defendants.
WELLS, J.S.C.
This is an inverse condemnation action brought on verified complaint and order to show cause. I note at the outset that it should have been captioned in the Law Division. N.J.S.A. 20:3-5. Orleans Builders and Dev. v. Byrne, 186 N.J.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Riggs v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Morris County Land Improvement Co. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Gardner v. NJ PINELANDS, COM'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Sod Farm Associates v. Springfield Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Pappas v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991