Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
HANDLER, J.
The central issue in this case is whether the application of state regulations that limit the use of land in an environmentally-sensitive area constitutes an unconstitutional taking of private property. The regulations strictly limit residential development on such land and require that all remaining undeveloped acreage be subject to a recorded deed restriction limiting it to agriculture and related uses. A farmer contends that the application of this regulatory scheme to his farm effects a partial taking of his property without compensation.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Pheasant Bridge Corp. v. Township of WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Bernardsville Quarry, Inc. v. Borough of BernardsvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Klumpp v. Borough of AvalonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Protest of Coastal PermitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Karam v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.