Legal Opinion
Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 23, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
125 N.J. 193 (1991)
593 A.2d 251
MARY GARDNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND MARY GARDNER, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HOBART R. GARDNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, COMMISSIONER OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND JOHN DOE(S), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 22, 1990.
Decided July 23, 1991.
Patrick F. McAndrew argued the cause for appellant (Brandt, Haughey, Penberthy, Lewis & Hyland, attorneys).
Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.