Legal Opinion

State v. Brinkley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 6, 1992No. 13640-6-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Timothy Brinkley appeals his conviction on a charge of attempted first degree robbery. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred in permitting the State to reopen its case in order to present witnesses to address a question from a juror. We affirm.

Brinkley was charged in Kitsap County Superior Court with attempted first degree robbery. On the third day of his jury trial, immediately after the defense had rested and the State had indicated that it had no rebuttal witnesses, a juror indicated to the trial court that he had a question. The trial judge instructed the juror to reduce the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ivory v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. State v. ZayasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Brinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State Of Washington v. Kurt R. KillianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington, V John Allen Booth, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State Of Washington, V Steven Brian YelovichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington, V. Jerry George Wood, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API