Legal Opinion

Glockner v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1914No. 3342PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from County Court, Osage County; C. T. Bennett, Judge. Action by B. F. Jacobs against J. Glockner. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, is engaged in the wholesale business in the city of New York. Defendant in error, plaintiff below, is a traveling salesman, employed by defendant to sell ladies’ ready to wear merchandise, upon a commission of I'Jg per cent, on all sales, except that he was not to have a commission on sales on which collection could not be made by the defendant. The agreement between the parties was consummated through correspondence. Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he had sold goods for defendant to the amount of $3,000; that he had sent in three orders which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. MilamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Wade v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Egan v. First Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API