Legal Opinion

St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1914No. 5209PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from, District Court, Carter County; Stillwell E. Bussell, Judge. Action by Harry A. Brown against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad 'Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

This proceeding is prosecuted from a judgment of the district court of Carter county. The parties will be Preferred to as they were in the trial court.

The plaintiff in his petition avers in substance that he is a resident of the state of Oklahoma, and that the defendant is a common carrier, engaged in the operation of a line of railway, and in interstate commerce between the town of Hugo, in the state of Oklahoma, and through the town of Ashdown to the town of Hope, in the state of Arkansas; that on the 20th day of February, 1911, while engaged in cutting out and taking on cars in the town of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Newman v. Great Shoshone & Twin Falls Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. SerbantasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API