Egan v. First Nat. Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; D. M* Po-e, Judge. "Action by James Egan against the First National Bank oí Tulsa. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.
On October 17, 1908, James Egan drew two cheeks for the sum of $3,-250 each upon the First National Bank of Tulsa, payable to Peter Deitchman and D. M. Martindale, respectively, A few days after the execution .and delivery of these checks Egan contends that he .notified the bank not to pay either of said checks, and that ‘the bank stopped payment of the Deitchman check, but that on the 19th day of October, 1909, -the bank paid 'the M:artin-dale check without his knowledge ox consent; .and in November, 1910, he instituted this suit against the bank to recover the amount of money thus paid by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Carter State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Short v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Teeters v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Willoughby v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- City of Oklahoma City v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.