Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Harrington
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tillman County; Action by J. E. Harrington and another, copartners, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiffs in-error will be designated as defendants and defendants in error as plaintiffs, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court. .
Plaintiffs, as owners and shippers, sued for $782, and recovered judgment for $595, as damages resulting from injuries suffered by 51 mules, in transit, shipped by them, in two cars, from Hico and Dublin, Tex (about three-fourths of the mules being loaded at Plico, and the remaining one-fourth, or half car, being loaded at Dublin), to themselves at-Frederick, Okla., as their final destination. The petition, so far' as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. C. C. Whitnack Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. PackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bank of SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Erisman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.