Legal Opinion
Dominion Magnesium Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1963No. 667-53PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
This is a patent suit under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, in which recovery is sought for reasonable and entire compensation for the unlicensed use by or for the Government of patented inventions. Plaintiff, a corporation of Ontario, Canada, is the record owner of United States Letters Patent Nos. 2,330,142 and 2,330,143 (referred to as the ’142 and ’143 patents), naming Lloyd Montgomery Pidgeon as inventor, and issued to plaintiff on September 21, 1943. These patents relate to methods and apparatus for obtaining magnesium, and, in *242the case of ’142, other volatizable metals.2 Plaintiff contends that one…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- McGill Incorporated v. John Zink Company, McGill Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. John Zink Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.