Legal Opinion
Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Motoshaver, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 6, 1937No. 1274(J) MPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity for the infringement of three patents. All of the patents are for shaving implements or shaving machines and were issued to Jacob Schick. They are respectively No. 1,721,530, No. 1,747,031, and No. 1,757,978. The first and second named complainant corporations are, respectively, the exclusive licensee and the owner of the patents in suit, and the last-named plaintiff is the sole' distributor throughout the State of California of the “Schick Dry Shaver,” a device which em*723bodies the inventions of the patents in suit.
The defendant companies are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. General Shaver Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1938
- Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Flakice Corp. v. Liquid Freeze Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Nicholl, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.