Legal Opinion
Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 18, 2014No. 1:12-cv-00488PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER TO ASSERT COUNTERCLAIMS
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In this contract dispute, Plaintiff, The Meyer Group, Ltd. (“Meyer”), claims that the Postal Regulatory Commission (“PRC”) breached an exclusive real estate brokerage agreement executed in 2004. Under this contract, Meyer agreed to assist PRC in obtaining office space in the Washington, D.C. area, and PRC agreed to condition its acceptance of any resulting lease upon the lessor providing Plaintiff a commission. Plaintiff contends that, under the brokerage agreement, it was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marchena v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Sonoran Technology and Professional Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Chapman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- In re LindseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.