Legal Opinion

Chapman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 30, 2017No. 12-183LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to Amend Complaint or Substitute Real Party in Interest; Invalid Assignment; Statute of Limitations; Relation-back; RCFC 15; RCFC 17

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

NANCY B. FIRESTONE, Senior Judge

Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion (EOF No. 54), filed September 30, 2016, for leave to file a second amended complaint in the above-captioned Fifth Amendment takings ease pursuant to Rule 15 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiffs seek to correct minor factual errors and technicalities and add a legal basis that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Acadiana Management Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. Diaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API