Legal Opinion

Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1994No. 75013PublishedCited by 254 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

Defendant, Heinold Commodities, Inc., appeals from an appellate court decision affirming in part and reversing in part a judgment entered for plaintiffs and against defendant. Plaintiff filed a four-count complaint against Heinold for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 1211/2, par. 261 et seq.). Plaintiffs suit alleged that Heinold had misrepresentated the nature of a "foreign service fee” in the sale of London Commodity Options (LCO’s) to class members from September 12, 1977,…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by254 opinions

  1. Oliveira v. Amoco Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Eychaner v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tricontinental Industries, Limited and Tricontinental Distribution, Limited v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Neade v. PortesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API