Legal Opinion
United States v. Eleven Vehicles
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-6779PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBRENO, District Judge.
Claimants Robert C. Ivy and Irene Ivy (the “Ivys”) seek recovery of various properties seized by the U.S. Government, the plaintiff in this action, pending their forfeiture as proceeds of money laundering and/or wire fraud. The Ivys have filed a motion for summary judgment. For the following rea sons, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 1
I. BACKGROUND
The Government seeks the forfeiture of properties that are allegedly the proceeds of money laundering and/or wire fraud. The accusation of criminal activity giving rise to this forfeiture…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. Eleven VehiclesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re 650 Fifth Ave. and Related PropertiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Eleven VehiclesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.