Legal Opinion
United States v. Schlesinger
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 7, 2005No. Cr. 02-485(ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
■In this case the government seeks, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2), the entry of a preliminary order of forfeiture in the total sum of $21,195,665.74 against defendants Nat Sehlesinger (“Sehlesinger”) and Goodmark Industries, Inc. (collectively the “defendants”). The government claims that these assets are forfeitable as the proceeds of mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. The defendants, who waived their right to have this matter determined by a jury, argue, among other things, that: (1) the building…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. EdelkindCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. VarroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In Re 650 Fifth Ave. and Related PropertiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. NicoloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.