Legal Opinion
United States v. Eleven Vehicles
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 30, 1997No. Civil Action 91-6779PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
In this civil forfeiture case, claimants Robert Clyde Ivy and Irene Ivy, and plaintiff United States, have each moved for reconsideration of the Court’s Order of August 30, 1996 (as amended September 9,1996), 1 which held that the government had reasonable cause for initiating the forfeiture action in this case but that the claimants were nevertheless entitled to attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) because the government’s position was not substantially justified. See Claimants’ motion for reconsideration and supporting memoran-da…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and AccessoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Duran v. CarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Jensen v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- In Re MungoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
- Snyder v. DaughertyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.