Deakyne v. Selective Insurance Co. of America
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BABIARZ, Judge.
This is the Court’s decision on cross-motions for summary judgment. At issue in this motion is whether defendant, Selective Insurance Company of America, is required to defend and indemnify David Deakyne, Jr., from a claim that arose out of an alleged act of self-defense. Consistent with the follow ing, this Court concludes that Selective Insurance Company of America is required to provide a defense and indemnification 1 to the Deakynes consistent with the parties’ insurance contract. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Co. of West Virginia v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Stonewall Insurance Co. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Elegant Slumming, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Watkins v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.