Herman v. Kelehan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
In a suit to compel specific performance of a written contract to make á will, the trial court found for plaintiff and ordered specific performance. From the judgment entered after denial of defendants’ motion for a new trial, all but the defendant Edward J. Herman appeal to this court.
Appellants’ principal contentions are, first, that the evidence does not sustain a finding that there was an effective contract to make a will which was acted upon by the parties, and, second, assuming that there was such a contract, that plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jannetta v. JannettaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- County of Ottawa v. ZwagermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Hanson v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Martin v. HurlbutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Kuhn v. SohnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alsdorf v. SvobodaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Goette v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Downing v. MaagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.