Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Grooms
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from a judgment for $5,000 in favor of Clifton M. Grooms on account of injuries suffered by him while engaged as an employee of the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company in setting tile in the wall of a store of the company in Charleston, South Carolina. The company had elected not to operate under the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation law, and in consequence could not defend the suit on the ground of the negligence of its employee or of his fellow employees or on the ground that the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. See South Carolina…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nuckolls v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Newbern v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Tucker v. Holly Hill Lumber CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Langston v. Fiske-Carter Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.