Nuckolls v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fishburne.
This action was brought for the recovery of damages for personal injuries, and resulted in a judgment of nonsuit. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was employed as a salesman of the defendant in one of its stores in the city of Charleston; that the defendant was an “employer” within the meaning of the South Carolina Workmen’s Compen sation Act, Code Supp., 1936, § 7035-1 et seq., at the time the plaintiff suffered his alleged injury, and the plaintiff was an “employee” within the meaning of the Act; that the defendant had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palmer v. Inhabitants of SumnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- High Splint Coal Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Jenkins v. Richmond &c. RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- James v. Fountain Inn Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Haselden v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Howard v. Foster & Kleiser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.