Legal Opinion

Nuckolls v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 5, 1939No. 14974PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

This action was brought for the recovery of damages for personal injuries, and resulted in a judgment of nonsuit. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was employed as a salesman of the defendant in one of its stores in the city of Charleston; that the defendant was an “employer” within the meaning of the South Carolina Workmen’s Compen sation Act, Code Supp., 1936, § 7035-1 et seq., at the time the plaintiff suffered his alleged injury, and the plaintiff was an “employee” within the meaning of the Act; that the defendant had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Inhabitants of SumnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  2. High Splint Coal Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Jenkins v. Richmond &c. RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  4. James v. Fountain Inn Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Haselden v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Howard v. Foster & Kleiser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API