Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Redmond

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1936No. Civ. 11001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

Upon appeal from a judgment admitting the will of decedent to probate in a contest instituted before probate, the judgment was affirmed by this court. (Estate of Marcus, 14 Cal. App. (2d) 254 [58 Pac. (2d) 385].) In its decision the court made no specific directions concerning costs on appeal, the general rule concerning costs being that “in all eases in which the judgment or order appealed from is affirmed, [and the order contains no directions as to the costs of appeal] the clerk will enter upon the record, and insert in the remittitur, a judgment that the respondent recover the costs of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Olmstead v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. In Re Estate of BumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Estate of EricksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Mara v. Farmers & Merchants National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Athens Masonic Lodge v. LeeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API