Estate of Erickson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
This was a contest after probate of the will of decedent. On appeal from a judgment setting aside and revoking the probate of the will, the judgment was reversed by this court, which in its decision made no order concerning costs. Following the general rule concerning costs on appeal (Rule XXIII of the Rules of this court), the clerk inserted in the remittitur a direction that appellant recover costs on appeal. Respondents now move for an order recalling the remittitur, and for issuance of a corrected remittitur omitting the words “appellant to recover costs on appeal”.
It has been held that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Olmstead v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartman v. BurfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- McMahon v. McCullochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Marcus v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Estate of BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935