Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Buss

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1898No. L. A. No. 327PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, allowing attorneys’ fees out of the estate of a deceased person. George Puterbaugh, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

C. A. Buss filed a petition in the superior court in and for the county of San Diego for the probate o'f the alleged last will of Marcus L. Olmstead, deceased.

The appellants herein filed their opposition to the probate thereof, to which opposition the respondents herein filed their answer. A trial of the issue was had, and upon the evidence adduced the court found, in substance, among other things: 1. That the will was duly executed by said Marcus L. Olmstead; 2. That after the execution thereof said Marcus L. Olmstead did cancel and revoke the said will; 3. That the respondents, C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Henry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. In re Estate of MarreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. In re Estate of ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Matter of Estate of WeickumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ripley v. PappadopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. In re Estate of SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Adair v. SchnackMontana Supreme Court · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API