Legal Opinion

Estate of Yoell

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1911No. S.F. No. 5392PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing payment of costs of contestants of a will out of funds of an estate or the funds of a special administratrix. Thos. F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Certain of the children of J. Alexander Yoell, deceased, contested the admission of his proffered will to probate. The first trial resulted in a disagreement of the jury, the second proved abortive because of the earthquake and fire, the third resulted in a mistrial, the jury standing eight for contestants and four for the proponents. The trial court then made its order fixing the costs of the contestants upon the second and third trial, and directing them to be paid by the special administratrix out of the funds of the estate. From that order this appeal is taken.

The question thus presented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In Re Estate of BumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Estate of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Estate of HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Mousnier v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Estate of SelbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API