Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Bump

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1907No. S.F. No. 4569PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The will of Nelson Bump, deceased, was offered for probate by Jesse H. Thomas, the executor, and Sarah Angelene Dean, the executrix, named in the will. Sarah L. Bump, the widow of deceased, filed a contest thereto. After a trial, the contest was denied and the will admitted to probate. The bill of exceptions states that in the order admitting the will to probate “said court did order that the costs of said contest be taxed against said estate.” The record contains no copy of the order and no further statement of its provisions in regard to costs. Thereafter, in due time, the proponents of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In re the Estate of McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Estate of HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Estate of SelbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Fleshman v. FleshmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API