Legal Opinion

Bailey v. City of Hermosa Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1920No. L. A. No. 5893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

This is an action by the owner of certain lots in the city of Hermosa Beach to enjoin the issuance by the city of certain street improvement bonds which, if issued, would purport to be a lien upon the plaintiff’s lots. The defendants are the city and certain of its officials and the assignee of the contractor who did the work in payment for which the bonds were to be issued. Judgment went against the plaintiff, who appeals. His contentions on appeal are that the assessment pursuant to which the bonds were to be issued is void for several different reasons, and also that even if the assessment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Reclamation District No. 3 v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Smith v. LightstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Thompson v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southlands Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McNutt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bass v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  4. City of Moundsville v. SteeleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Canby v. Council of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API