Canby v. Council of City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The appellants instituted an equitable proceeding, praying that a writ of mandate issue in the superior court requiring the Council of the City of Los Angeles to modify assessments of their properties abutting upon a certain highway, and that they be granted such relief as should be deemed just and equitable. A demurrer to their complaint was sustained, whereupon an amended complaint was filed, praying that the superior court take “equitable cognizance and jurisdiction of the facts” alleged, and of the parties and render “such judgments, orders and relief as may be legal and equitable”; that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Nev. Cty. & Sacramento Canal Co. v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McPheeters v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hails v. MartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Logan v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951