State v. Flynn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
The evidence was legally sufficient to support conviction as to all the defendants, and the demurrers to the evidence were properly overruled. If any doubt existed as to the sufficiency of the evidence against Maude Laymon, it must be dispelled when we look at the whole series of transactions she was sharing with her codefendants as raising an inference of a conspiracy to commit the crime alleged, and to cover it up by devices and maneuvers that would baffle pursuit. During the ride near Jonesville, and just before Winters missed his pocketbook and found the money gone, this woman was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . BrackettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . SchoolfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. WisemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- In Re the Last Will & Testament of WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.